This is a comment that I hear from parents from time to time.
Luckily this isn’t something I hear often, but when I do, I know that it is important to explain why this line of thinking could actually hurt your child rather than help them.
The basic line of thinking behind this comment is the belief that the child may just need a little bit more time to catch up and that there is not a true language disorder. Yes, that very well could be the case. All children develop at different rates which is why developmental norms are a range and not a specific month of acquirement. A child is considered a late talker when they are under 30 months of age, have less than 50 words, and/or are not yet combining words. Research has shown that about 70% of late talkers catch up by Kindergarten. However, while these late talkers “catch up,” research has also shown that they continue to experience social, language, literacy, and executive functioning weaknesses that persist into adolescence (all things that speech-language pathologists help treat, btw!). So, that begs the question, did they truly catch up? Or would starting early intervention actually have been the best way to go? Was taking your chances that they would outgrow it, worth it?